From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov  5 12:26:09 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77B9A950
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Nov 2014 12:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D153FB6
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Nov 2014 12:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41])
 by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F93033C27;
 Wed,  5 Nov 2014 07:26:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147)
 id 916F33980E; Wed,  5 Nov 2014 07:26:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>
Subject: Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)
References: <20141031185621.GC15967@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
 <54573B31.7080809@gmx.de>
 <20141103212438.0893c3dc@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <14d0c0b9ee9ca31877d43a3c29481717@ultimatedns.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.11.1411041608200.91469@wonkity.com>
 <4b76467a41c12811b0bd9b6ab13906c8@ultimatedns.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.11.1411042022410.99894@wonkity.com>
 <ecb8554cb4fe5b25be718648fb5ee7d8@ultimatedns.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 07:26:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <ecb8554cb4fe5b25be718648fb5ee7d8@ultimatedns.net> (Chris H.'s
 message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2014 20:26:47 -0800")
Message-ID: <44ioitx292.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:26:09 -0000

"Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> writes:

> Difficult to tell for sure. I haven't examined the [UFS/ZFS] source
> to know for sure. Be valuable info. :)

Reading source not required: start with "man newfs"; note blocksize and frag-size.