From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 13:41:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C131106566C for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@cederstrand.dk) Received: from csmtp2.one.com (csmtp2.one.com [91.198.169.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2E68FC15 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (unknown [176.222.238.90]) by csmtp2.one.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F12D3307BE1A; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Erik Cederstrand In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:41:33 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0048212B-ABA7-4CA1-983D-6B6A6DF66D35@cederstrand.dk> References: To: Luba Tang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MCLinker and llvm-config X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:41:41 -0000 Luba, Thanks for the update. Den 25/07/2012 kl. 11.22 skrev Luba Tang: > BTW, I think llvm-config is necessary for every LLVM-based project. If = it > will not be in BSD system, I think we can negotiate an approach to get = rid > of it. I created a FreeBSD port for llvm-config for testing MCLinker, so this = is not a problem now. If MCLinker is imported into FreeBSD, I expect the = build system to be replaced, as David explained. As soon as your patches are committed to LLVM and backported to FreeBSD, = I'll see if I can submit a FreeBSD port for MCLinker for easier testing. Thanks, Erik