From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 1 18:15:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB84CF3DE9 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FCBFB9 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6D2B4CF3DE6; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7E0CF3DE2; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from mx0.gentlemail.de (mx0.gentlemail.de [IPv6:2a00:e10:2800::a130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F68FB6; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from mh0.gentlemail.de (mh0.gentlemail.de [IPv6:2a00:e10:2800::a135]) by mx0.gentlemail.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v21IF8Lt049551; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:15:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from titan.inop.mo1.omnilan.net (titan.inop.mo1.omnilan.net [IPv6:2001:a60:f0bb:1::3:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mh0.gentlemail.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72992587; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:15:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <58B70FAB.6020406@omnilan.de> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:15:07 +0100 From: Harry Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniLAN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100906 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Wills CC: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org, virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11} update to 10.1.0 References: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org> <4239ee2c-6cd8-acad-a4e3-a6fdcb1c28bb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4239ee2c-6cd8-acad-a4e3-a6fdcb1c28bb@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mx0.gentlemail.de [IPv6:2a00:e10:2800::a130]); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:15:08 +0100 (CET) X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: mx0.gentlemail.de; Sender-ip: ; Sender-helo: mh0.gentlemail.de; ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 18:15:11 -0000 Bezüglich Steve Wills's Nachricht vom 01.03.2017 06:57 (localtime): > Hi All, > > Thanks to everyone who tested. > > I've updated the patch and packages in the same location and fixed a > number of issues. Please re-test if you can. > > The only remaining issue that I know of is building with libunwind > installed. If you run into an issue buidling, uninstall libunwind. > Upstream is looking at that. > > This is likely the final change before I commit this, which currently I > plan to do on 3/15. So if you use it, now is your chance to test and > report issues. Thanks for your work! I'm new to open-vm-tools, until now I always took the source from the ESXi provided iso which contains vmware-freebsd-tools.tar.gz and compiled modules under vmware-tools-distrib/lib/modules/source/ For stable/11, there's some adoption to do, so I thought it's a good time to try open-vm-tools. All my guests don't have X11, so I'm only testing the no-x11 version. vmmemctl.ko seems to work and vmtoolsd also seems to do it's job, I can shutdown the machine and viclient reports guest's IP adderss. I don't use vnx, I just can report that it attaches. But there are no drivers for vmci nor pvscsi in open-vm-tools also, right? What's vmblock.ko providing? Thanks, -harry