From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Nov 5 11:14:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6546C2E333 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 11:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5857CE5A for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 11:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id t79so94095148wmt.0 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:14:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CWdCudnt0k1FqOV5VdDCznVjcV8FcTYC18vrIg0BYT0=; b=Iw5eD8sILuiUH/Y2cqS4nfN7BBtlKx/0QS4KG8iNCmYp+MzOZA+79Me/szlLTOdWZj mOE/aF5m6mBl/yR2Qx3a5gWvN71xsGXJVcAza5+eCmmPb7TZabt2F+vIvS9hwPU/bLdR J5S506syvew9SdcGDdV2tekFFGfrSTCu+C2lx1P/RAXO2CU3O19PvN2cMlEyURk9ETbb QmpeMAN/Otvzk0KL+L+L7xEu95VYFv8gY/vT8AzTuqpPgrjF7o8OAecalNjEEpV6LuMX a2my1LHr8pC+SjxnYDDXwvrUU9RqaRkpNKJ4XAeNQo/CiMs9tLB0DbakB+wTwwt4c9dq eKeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CWdCudnt0k1FqOV5VdDCznVjcV8FcTYC18vrIg0BYT0=; b=WIBLL6wuPk9+2P64DvXHer+ONa0vdtadIohnHBKg95gi6vrH9LIs2ePbpNRfj6uOb2 MZvVYD19GYByqXksr6H5YC8SHLdBPkGvV1clR4ZGKfy7MolvJQsUdQXyUNhvE+dkq6gB E4PN4yF+pSPjvU1STq79+SR9zCGH7zDtW+P0xUrcv6+QUgCMLojyaVK8zSgGffHfDVYA k2sBwl3rwKTXdsHaFRgH7ZKeA1+21y2BcHI9fMbyWpoFGvGBxhKw1j3sH60zwTf+gJnz CdKJaMtuRqIarIOYK73mb5MIjmGhsrZAxjo9iyXf1/q9ieGhYj0I0ZFN7SujiSVy8GDj 46kA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveQS3HgkahkCj1b22rkfUNb1KeUthI1htzuwwRa8gNVS3UiKKKdTbIZ72xm76N0nQ== X-Received: by 10.194.87.130 with SMTP id ay2mr14505168wjb.44.1478344493732; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm1687876wma.10.2016.11.05.04.14.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:14:52 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com Subject: Re: mail/{neo,}mutt: why not packaged with gpgme? Message-ID: <20161105111452.c76pnuvfloc56r54@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20161102204551.jkismaljloqwlokp@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sinabvmerpf5dlus" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161102204551.jkismaljloqwlokp@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161104 (1.7.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 11:14:56 -0000 --sinabvmerpf5dlus Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrot= e: > Hello, >=20 > While talking about an issue I have with mail/{neo,}mutt and > security/gnupg on #gnupg on freenode I was advised to use > security/gpgme with mutt. I haven't been using gpgme for a while, > mainly because the packaged versions of both mail/{neo,}mutt have > it disabled and I was too lazy to compile it on my own. Since > I got that advice, I've started wondering: >=20 > Why is gpgme disabled by default? >=20 > As was argued (and as I experienced myself) setting up mutt to > work with gpgme is much easier than without. Especially gnupg2 > made it difficult to configure mutt without gpgme. So why not > enabling gpgme in the packaged versions? >=20 > I decided not to create a PR about this request. If that's wrong, > tell me and I'll create one. >=20 > Niklaas Actually having tested it, yes you are right it is way more simple, I have activated it in neomutt Best regards, Bapt --sinabvmerpf5dlus Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCAAGBQJYHb8sAAoJEGOJi9zxtz5aMJ0QAI6llDdMCmPFhl5fhr1WS059 8ioGv9AJLMiIHKtkhYoczyBD9kht8vrk8Ij3fI1hq3YAtYPTAB5lgJZAfRpkEDMU zeEgw5B7JVFZ2Hi55pvRxuG+vwxAKQYEO70Fp2rWdwE5Yn7ypX1TqcHtXeiWTmu9 nPKFQyqaVo/Wbnbda+77XAtMGpi3NXOJ4t+1rVIjje8nt2Y/tUlqZ4vo9JkYn5O5 QPzULj8FHr73MXqR9PactUAeDAWWlGJErnE6iHJ7cWZZ6OEJhyiQjVanySYWcXMn fY+Tkmb8Zwmtzkp0B/Iy08g5VtSEfL95Az6Ck7Q/O9+11sA0U8tF4muo1PfNu1yP ilt7PcbdvHVKyBoEXXqJ48FxTwBrTpvmcxfH8rYbGNZsrEH45cZJ9vVvnTAJGNrY tzlh2E9fjM8Kdn3wS1itRsY/hkqnqeDEH2imGGDBj/y0b3lZj7ap3OCr5LIP7fG0 WWdXhUSINgPYeskdovXo5YBxiF5hTkc621lQdQ/JVmdnuiJOCOT0hK+wMdwehKC5 YnmDXwxo130MkYpZMBbLLTRowhqNP7t8CXEyjF5IebLrs84Xh2DHoYp9KOALs3ox U1gTjK/lNWUiP2ZW/vNW3PF6vsAmsZLDjnlkWq6ts2TeX1d5c3Nvzu2pi1obs1Wd lqMy0DZ/nq4xwwzeQZG4 =nDsL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sinabvmerpf5dlus--