Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:00:25 +0100 From: steinab@student.matnat.uio.no (Steinar Bormer) To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_5_2 Message-ID: <3jzbrokclxy.fsf@thrir.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20040128234048.GA87896@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:40:48 -0800") References: <3jzfze01axc.fsf@tiu.ifi.uio.no> <20040128234048.GA87896@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: | On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:04:47PM +0100, Steinar Bormer wrote: | > | > [14:02 pallotta steinab> uname -rsvp | > FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #0: Wed Jan 28 13:15:30 CET 2004 root@pallotta.studby.uio.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALLOTTA i386 | > | > Am I completely mistaken, or shouldn't this be 5.2-RELEASE-p1 or | > similar? | | They were updated in preparation for 5.2.1-RELEASE, which is still | forthcoming. Thanks. Today's make world changed it to: [13:57 pallotta steinab> uname -rs FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC My impression of following a RELENG_X_X-tree was that the version numbering changed every time an update (to one or more files) was done, and that updates to several files were always done together, but this is obviously incorrect? Steinar B.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3jzbrokclxy.fsf>