Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:30:29 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool .la file policy? Message-ID: <20040128143028.GF20343@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <m3n088jgqp.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <m3n088jgqp.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/QKKmeG/X/bPShih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 03:21:50PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: =20 > what is the policy on libtool .la files? Do we install them or do we try > to avoid them whenever possible? It seems libtool is smart enough to > figure the link path by itself even when the .la file is missing, as > long as the libraries are in a somewhat standard search path. You can find info about it at http://freebsd.rambler.ru/ There were many argues about it. -Kirill --/QKKmeG/X/bPShih Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF8eEQC1G6a60JuURAgkVAKCGQHNsBf2FXkoaUoL3c0kmum8AVwCeN1c+ 4UZQeOSNMn/APN9qmVwXZ58= =Rqx9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/QKKmeG/X/bPShih--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040128143028.GF20343>