Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:01:15 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu, imp@village.org, m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970109135843.594B-100000@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199701090057.QAA05045@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * So, my proprosal is for each of us to add __44bsd__ to our list of > * predefined macros. > > I have no problem with that. In fact, if we are going to do this we > should put this (gcc mods, not necessarily the port mods) in the 2.2 > branch, so that the whole ports tree doesn't break down to 2.2 users > right after the release. > The most difficult problem is to determine what __44bsd__ macro covers. Is it will be frozen list of features? Or __44bsd__ will reflect some version/date which synchronizes through all *BSDs? Looks unreal. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970109135843.594B-100000>