Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:17:37 -0800 From: Peter Clutton <peterclutton@gmail.com> To: Dave <dmehler26@woh.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: schedulers and compatibility options in 6.0-r Message-ID: <57416b300511111417k66dfbd21o7b200ae0c01b3e67@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <000601c5e6c1$142bf970$0900a8c0@satellite> References: <000601c5e6c1$142bf970$0900a8c0@satellite>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/11/05, Dave <dmehler26@woh.rr.com> wrote: > Hello, > I've got a 6.0-RELEASE machine and am going to compile a new kernel o= n > it. > I've got a few questions as to the best options. This is a single-process= or > machine, going to run only 6.0. Which of the schedulers should i use > SCHED_4BSD or SCHED_ULE >From what I have heard (I have not tested) SCHED_ULE will have its advantages, but they are not necessarily showing at the moment as it is still in development. I think it is recommended until then, to test it first to see if you notice any advantages for your setup, but otherwise stick to 4BSD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57416b300511111417k66dfbd21o7b200ae0c01b3e67>