From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 19 14:55:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA08567 for current-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 14:55:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA08551 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 14:55:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA10556; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:55:26 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id XAA27450; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 23:55:26 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 23:55:26 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199711192255.XAA27450@bitbox.follo.net> From: Eivind Eklund To: jcondon CC: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: jcondon's message of Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:33:48 -0500 Subject: Re: ppp pmdemand dials when I dont want it to References: <3473310C.EEF454E2@computer.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Been wrestling with this for about a week. Started running 2.2.2 and > did a fresh reinstall to 2.2.5. All seems to work fine except it dials > and apperently does DNS lookups for apperently no reason. I have > removed the -q option on Sendmail, and disabled Sendmail altogether. > When I unplug the ethernet cable from the Win95 machine, or dialup via > its own modem / DUN it doesn't cause the UNIX box to dial in. However > when the Win95 is plugged into the ethernet and running nothing more > then explorer and systay it will dial in with in 15 mins usually > sooner. I did notice that if I dial in with the Win95 box and do > NOTHING it sends about 250 bytes a min and receives about 15K. Could > this have something to do with it? This is a Win95 bug, related to having exported SMB drives. If you drop the SMB drives, it (probably) won't dial out. There is also a registry setting to achieve this, but I don't remember what it is. And it's not a reasonable topic for freebsd-hackers, IMHO - use freebsd-questions. Eivind.