From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 15:35:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DCE16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:35:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31AC643D2D for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmuthmann@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Mar 2005 15:35:03 -0000 Received: from p54805A62.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.2]) (84.128.90.98) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 04 Mar 2005 16:35:03 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1009348 From: Matthias Muthmann To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200503022010.39072.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> References: <200502240244.03104.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200503021050.35620.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <1109789237.19508.3.camel@localhost> <200503022010.39072.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-97gOsJDFP9evNzfI2IR+" Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:34:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1109950493.21431.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: Dejan Lesjak Subject: Re: Problems with X.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:35:07 -0000 --=-97gOsJDFP9evNzfI2IR+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mi, 2005-03-02 at 20:10 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > Just the ones that don't work (if they are consecutive in the row, only a= =20 > range would be fine). I'm also interested in whether without these patche= s=20 > applied - was the row in question behaving the same as the other keys (ie= =20 > codes generated being off by one) or was it behaving differently even the= n? >=20 >=20 > Dejan >=20 Ok, now I tried X without your patches. The lowest row behaves in the same way as with your patches: e.g. keycode 198 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol) But the keycodes are shifted by one (Y is 191, not 190 ...) --=20 Matthias Muthmann --=-97gOsJDFP9evNzfI2IR+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCKIAdeA8bkj+29gMRAsdbAKCRp+J6gsRWeQfdgV0Jl0YaeA9eiwCfbFos YguyZiSkMhyLpv8oNZsOE7U= =JkEP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-97gOsJDFP9evNzfI2IR+--