Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:26:23 -0500 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <CACqU3MXPdk0fanGeLdEpanWivsy_AzdwEJTgtDCndV75SGhxdA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120125202246.GA26447@lonesome.com> References: <CACqU3MXGxRpyT4CDHmzpvzwSPsFi1MHxWa6C9RJiJ1jditWB4Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120125072809.GA11115@lonesome.com> <CACqU3MWS92tn0zUV=PGRYqjz-2K=6mgSU0M1tM7KnrsFhNaJ_g@mail.gmail.com> <20120125202246.GA26447@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:58:41AM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> > You seem to be obsessed by picking over >> > semantics and finding shortcomings to be aggreived over. >> > >> Semantics and proper, independent, API are crucial. > > I'm talking about the semantics of the non-technical part: the wording > of things that people post in email. =A0viz: the time-wasting nonsense > about "oh, it seems to be released already, has anyone noticed?" from > a few weeks ago. > > It was 100% FUD, which apparently you knew perfectly well at the time, > and thus AFAICT only posted it to draw attention to yourself. > > That's the drama I'm talking about. > you are misquoting and misinterpreting me, I merely asked "Has 9.0 been released ?", followed by misleading clues I tried to gather in a thread where the original poster's uname shown "9-RELEASE". I see no FUD in this and none was intended. The rest of the thread indeed went ballistic. - Arnaud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MXPdk0fanGeLdEpanWivsy_AzdwEJTgtDCndV75SGhxdA>