From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 14 11:21:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 144BA16A4CE; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BF5D743D3F; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:21:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 0539B14733; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:21:54 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:21:54 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho
To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
In-Reply-To: <xzpznajxnia.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403141318110.1317-100000@pancho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:00:12 -0800
cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: RFC: doscmd removal
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:21:56 -0000

> No, it sounds like a good thing to do right now so we don't have to
> live with it for the entire 5.x lifetime.

Excellent!  Everybody else was already in agreement.

So, you'll be submitting the patches to install it to the ports
tree, then?  Including dealing with whatever "odd corners of the
kernel" that a previous poster mentioned that it touched?

Note that before you reach for the keyboard to say "just delete
it", that previous posters in this thread have stated that they
use this function.

mcl