From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 03:29:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58331065671; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Received: from tydfam.jp (ns.tydfam.jp [61.197.228.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A888FC23; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Received: from localhost (tyd3.sub.tydfam.jp [192.168.1.3]) by tydfam.jp (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2B3S01D011229; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:28:01 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:28:09 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20080311.122809.-345485952.ken@tydfam.jp> To: mbowie@buzmo.com From: ken In-Reply-To: <20080309.212020.1678758621.ken@tydfam.jp> References: <20080309.212020.1678758621.ken@tydfam.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/6193/Tue Mar 11 08:22:45 2008 on daemon.sub.tydfam.jp X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=9.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on daemon.sub.tydfam.jp Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, glewis@eyebeyond.com, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eclipse-devel 3.3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:29:20 -0000 My appology, Mike. I found that I made a mistake and brought in a lot of bugs relating to minor versioning of plugins with eclipse-devel332.tgz. Please pick up newer one from http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-devel332.tgz and give a try. I checked it with amd64/jdk15 and it is seemingly OK. Checking the implementation after 400 miles drive did not work... Sorry for your incovenience.