Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:52:28 -0400 From: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> To: Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net> Cc: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD snapshots available: stable/10 (20150625 r284813) Message-ID: <C6D0BB56-5A08-4C71-B1B1-CC8B38F902D2@distal.com> In-Reply-To: <55940879.8060604@pix.net> References: <20150626174927.GA69720@FreeBSD.org> <559330CF.2050606@pix.net> <20150701001613.GH5423@FreeBSD.org> <55934CFB.7050407@pix.net> <56A9EB91-2F97-4096-99C8-26D3EFC13D2D@distal.com> <20150701023640.GM5423@FreeBSD.org> <29FAA191-D0E5-4127-B016-65B4AE42ABE8@distal.com> <20150701025433.GN5423@FreeBSD.org> <5593D9ED.4080402@pix.net> <55940879.8060604@pix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Jul 1, 2015, at 11:34, Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net> wrote:
> I discovered that if I comment out the following lines
> from my /etc/rc.conf, the machine boots reliably:
>=20
> ifconfig_bge0=3D"DHCP"
> ifconfig_bge0_ipv6=3D"inet6 accept_rtadv"
>=20
> Of course, with no network connection, it's not a very useful machine,
> but this probably is important to know while debugging the cause of
> the problem.
I had realized that bringing the interface up was the trigger for the =
panic.
An interesting thing, given the above, would be to note whether using
a static IPv4 address (i.e., not DHCP or SYNCDHCP which is what I have),
or whether disabling IPv6 or IPv6 accept_rtadv would make any =
difference.
I=E2=80=99m guessing it won=E2=80=99t matter, but I also have a =
similar config in my rc.conf,
so testing a wider variety of configs might be of value.
- Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C6D0BB56-5A08-4C71-B1B1-CC8B38F902D2>