From owner-cvs-all  Wed Dec 22 18:25: 4 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4ED5914F81; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:24:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bright@wintelcom.net)
Received: from localhost (bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA19504;
	Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:56:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:56:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys buf.h src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c
In-Reply-To: <199912230015.QAA11730@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912221849370.12109-100000@fw.wintelcom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:

> :> 
> :>    Yahh.  Another similar problem:  The MAP_ flags in the VM subsystem
> :>    are even worse.
> :> 
> :
> :Agreed.  The ones (used internally) and passed to vm_map_insert and
> :vm_map_find should have a VM_ prefix.
> :
> :Alan
> 
>     I've put it on my post-release todo list.

How about making that pre-release to avoid confusion when
MFC'ing vm code where it would be even more dangerous?  

It'd be better to have that worked out now then when trying
to MFC anything.

-Alfred

> 
> 					Matthew Dillon 
> 					<dillon@backplane.com>
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message