From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 00:19:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C5816A4CE; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:19:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za (zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za [146.64.24.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430C843D1D; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:19:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhay@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za) Received: from zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1R8ItiE014149; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:18:55 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jhay@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za) Received: (from jhay@localhost)i1R8ItCg014148; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:18:55 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jhay) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:18:55 +0200 From: John Hay To: Alexander Nedotsukov Message-ID: <20040227081855.GA12206@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> References: <20040227065623.GA10395@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> <403EEF14.6090509@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <403EEF14.6090509@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: games/gcompris* update X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:19:09 -0000 > I think you shoud follow generic rule of dealing with ports maintained > by other people. Well I did ask on gnome@ which is the maintainer of gcompris2. :-) > Second you may want to use this as start point: > http://people.freebsd.org/~bland/gcompriss2.patch > http://people.freebsd.org/~bland/libassetml.shar Thanks, I had a quick look and will have a better look tonight. libassetml looks fine so why don't you commit it, then there is one thing less to worry about? > I did this some time ago but not commited because besides gcompross have > --without-python configure option it still complains a lot about missing > modules at run-time. So it usable but definetly provoke a lot of python > related PRs I won't to deal with this time. I haven't seen this, but then I didn't try --without-python because there were already so many things that requires python. I'll have a look at it over the weekend though. Was there a reason that you wanted it without python? From what I understand there isn't anything in gcompris using it yet, they just added the framework for it, so that boards can be written in python. Hmm, I also haven't tried sound yet because I first have to locate a sound card for my kids' computer. :-) John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org