From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon Jun 19 20:12: 0 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.osd.bsdi.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3254337B52E
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com)
Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA04099;
	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com)
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kblob discussion. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:54:08 PDT."
             <20000619155408.E17420@fw.wintelcom.net> 
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:12:22 -0700
Message-ID: <4096.961470742@localhost>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Last I heard, cdrom.com uses 2gigs of kernel virtual address space.
> 
> And what part of:
> 
>  "Booting on machines with exactly 4GB requires other patches, not included"
> 
> didn't you understand?

Why don't you ask DG about the current state of play rather than
piling assumption on top of assumption, Albert?  Or would that be
too easy?

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message