From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Oct 10 01:03:24 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA21416
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:03:24 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA21409
          ; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:03:19 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id BAA17216; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:03:17 -0700
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:03:17 -0700
Message-Id: <199510100803.BAA17216@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Reply-to: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951009003511.3266A-100000@mramirez.sy.yale.edu> (message from Marc Ramirez on Mon, 9 Oct 1995 00:44:06 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

(Sorry for crosspost -- replies to ports only)

Well, so what do you guys think about updating the "port"?  (I know,
it's a binary-only port and we can't distribute the distfile/package
anyway....)  I've been using it since yesterday, and it feels really
"beta", so I won't update the port unless people really want the
change to go in.

Satoshi