Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 23:59:44 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rfork patch, please comment Message-ID: <381937D0.BD15D2E5@softweyr.com> References: <XFMail.991029105857.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910282139280.11610-100000@current1.whistle.com> <199910290450.WAA02527@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote:
>
> > Actually the kernel side of it would be quite quick..
> > there is a user side component that multiplexes the user threads onto the
> > kernel threads but it's actually pretty straight forward.
> >
> > We may try give a bit of a talk about it a t teh next Bay Area freeBS
> > User's Group meeting.. As well as dicuss the other possibilities.
> > That'll give us a reason to get our act together. :-)
>
> Except that 99% of the FreeBSD developers don't got the the User's group
> meeting in the Bay Area.
Unless that is Farmington Bay. ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?381937D0.BD15D2E5>