From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Oct  4 22:56:14 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA12802
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 22:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA12722
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 22:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA28570;
	Mon, 5 Oct 1998 15:54:42 +1000
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 15:54:42 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199810050554.PAA28570@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: dmaddox@scsn.net, mike@smith.net.au
Subject: Re: Shouldn't 'make includes' install stand.h?
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>     I'm not trying to be combative here; this is not a religious issue to
>> me...  The current behavior just seems to me to violate POLA.
>
>Only if you have misapprehensions about what 'make includes' does.  It 
>seems mostly to trip up people with such misapprehensions.

`includes' is a private target in src/Makefile for installing [all] the
includes.

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message