From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 14:29:31 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACCE1065670
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783188FC13
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 60DFB5C3B; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:30:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:30:49 -0500
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Vineyard.NET Administration" <ericx@vineyard.net>
Message-ID: <20090114143049.GD50694@atarininja.org>
References: <20090107203240.331E0252D44@mailman.vineyard.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090107203240.331E0252D44@mailman.vineyard.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cgiwrap version 4.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:29:31 -0000

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:32:40PM -0500, Vineyard.NET Administration wrote:
> I've got a PCI compliance firm breathing down my neck about my version
> of cgiwrap. Any plans to update the port to version 4.1? Would it be
> helpful if I supplied the patch?

In case you missed it, I updated this port and made the appropriate
entry in vuxml so it will now show up in portaudit.

-- WXS