From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 2 9:33:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1A237B422 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 09:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enteract.com (dschrock.cpe.dsl.enteract.com [216.80.53.93] (may be forged)) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA94749 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 11:33:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dschrock@enteract.com) Message-ID: <39B12CC2.5FA1928D@enteract.com> Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2000 11:37:22 -0500 From: Daniel Schrock X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-4mdksmp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Non-biased FreeBSD vs. Linux comparision References: <20000823113339.A38586@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20000823185133.A31963@localhost.bsd.net.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nimrod Mesika wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:33:39AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > > On Tuesday, 22 August 2000 at 18:30:33 -0300, Christian Jacken wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > is someone aware of detailed non-biased FreeBSD vs. Linux comparision(s)? > > > > I like to think that http://www.daemonnews.org/200006/dadvocate.html > > is relatively unbiased. > > The real problem with this kind of comparision is that both products > are moving targets and things seem to be changing fast in terms of > features and performance. > > Personally, I like the way the FreeBSD project is managed using a > single CVS repository. The build-everything-from-source attitude is > what really made the difference for me. > > -- > Nimrod. Personally, I think the best way to get a non-biased opinion is to run both yourself and do your own comparison. My gateway is FreeBSD-4.1 and my workstation is Mandrake-7.1. I also have a Quake3 server running Mandrake 7.1 as well. As far as servers go, I found FreeBSD to be far better than Linux. A default install includes basically every network troubleshooting tool you could need or want. It also has a more logical structure. You know exactly where to find what you want. As a workstation, I prefer Linux. My soundcard was setup automatically. Mandrake gave me every window manager by default and X-Setup was hassle-free. And I actually like the X-Windows Login, no need for straight command line unless I want to. My preferances are affected by the hardware in each box. It would be nice to have identical boxes and compare without the hardware differences, but having 4 boxen already, I need a real good reason to buy another (which i can't find yet). On a semi-unrelated note, does anyone know of a FreeBSD app that would boot me directly to an X-login? Anyway, good luck and have fun. daniel schrock d_jab@anonymous-daemon.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message