From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 18:05:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C855C1065676 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: from web32702.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32702.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 785048FC23 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: (qmail 95255 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jan 2009 17:38:36 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: lEFWqA8VM1lcqcvTYdAGhfOsIP6Q1JXPnWfhdfzeUDhrn5LvfBVTYkql.IJOnnDx_TTPy9RxZCpXiXH4Ofa83cqyb35l5BzlOlPXKf0zAZUBI9olERcVRFfFkCdDgqb4.T7n.wphN0S9VOlPH025_qd6VbO0XBzcOjCxfl8tqajkzZkR0U2avVJoyt_L Received: from [190.24.208.73] by web32702.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:38:35 PST X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:38:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: Chagin Dmitry MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <25454.95171.qm@web32702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:33:28 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ELF branding. looking to a ".note.ABI-tag" section X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: giffunip@tutopia.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:05:17 -0000 Hi; As the author of kern/118473 I think that ELF notes for brand-ELFing is a useless non standard hack. I do understand that we want to teach our linuxulator about GNU ELF notes, but why would we want to use them for FreeBSD binaries? If you follow the posting on the lists by John Polstra and ELF spec you will find we don't need ELF notes. There is also a thread in some binutils list that made me conclude the reason they chose for not using the standard way was "NIH". Pedro.