Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:41:35 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/wine Makefile
Message-ID:  <4C8543EF.1010205@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1009062015370.17560@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References:  <201009061123.o86BNY5u061220@repoman.freebsd.org> <4C85284D.8000707@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1009062015370.17560@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/06/2010 11:28 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> Explicitly configure using --without-xcomposite, --without-xinerama and
>>> --without-xrandr so that builds are more reproduciable and we avoi hidden
>>> dependencies when building outside of a minimal build environment, thus
>>> making packages more portable.
>> That sounds very reasonable. I'm just wondering if you could add OPTIONS
>> to enable those features however ...
>
> The short answer is: yes, based on concrete user feedback I have added
> and will continue to add OPTIONS.

Excellent. :)

> The longer answers is: Wine itself has 44 --enable/--disable knobs and I
> guess we do not want to have that many OPTIONS nor do we want to build it
> with the maximum number of features and thus dependencies.  What I am
> trying to do is to have those features that are relevant for most users
> always built, those where I see little to no use always disabled, and
> those in between as OPTIONS.  As I receive input and suggestions from
> users, I move things between those three categories, the most common,
> but not sole, move being the one from the disabled to the OPTIONS bucket.
>
> Does that sound like a reasonable approach?

Yes of course, and I certainly agree that we don't want 44 knobs for one 
port. I would suggest that you consider grouping multiple related 
configure --options into one OPTIONS knob, but you've probably already 
considered that. :)


hth,

Doug

-- 

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/

	Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
			-- Pablo Picasso




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C8543EF.1010205>