From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 15:13:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FD316A4BF for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 15:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00C43FE1 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 15:13:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h94MDXLY080069; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:13:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:13:33 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: joe@joe-lewis.com Message-ID: <20031004221333.GF5283@dan.emsphone.com> References: <3F7F29C5.7030606@relia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F7F29C5.7030606@relia.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 22:13:35 -0000 In the last episode (Oct 04), Joe Lewis said: > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system. > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM, > which would be fine and dandy except for it is installed by default > as static. This means I PAM is now AM, because nothing is pluggable. > And Huh? So all the /usr/lib/libpam_*.so files are just there for show? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com