From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Feb 24 02:56:08 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id CAA13358 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 24 Feb 1995 02:56:08 -0800 Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com [16.1.0.22]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id CAA13352 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 1995 02:56:06 -0800 Received: from rks32.pcs.dec.com by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (5.65/10Aug94) id AA11043; Fri, 24 Feb 95 02:53:18 -0800 Received: by rks32.pcs.dec.com (Smail3.1.27.1 #16) id m0rhxcD-0005PNC; Fri, 24 Feb 95 11:51 MEZ Message-Id: To: pgf%foxharp.boston.ma.us@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com Cc: ports%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: Message from Paul Fox of Thu, 23 Feb 95 23:50:38 EST. Reply-To: gj@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: vile port directories available Date: Fri, 24 Feb 95 10:51:17 GMT From: "gj%pcs.dec.com@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com" Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > well, i never heard back from anyone regarding this, so i don't know > if anyone's done anything with it or not. I use vile/xvile all the the time, I'll give 'em a try and see whether they work and report back to the list. > (i still don't quite understand the proper protocol for all this. can > someone please fill me in? should i be pestering the list with this?) Seems to me that this is the right place to announce this sort of thing. Of course, most porters stick their ports into incoming on freefall and then they get grabbed by some kind soul and put into the ports tree. Gary J.