From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 14:29:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C7116A4CE for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:29:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D658643D41 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:29:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0IMTXip076563; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:29:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0IMTWrN076562; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:29:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:29:32 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Robert Cousins Message-ID: <20040118222932.GG65333@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040114200042.1AE8716A4FB@hub.freebsd.org> <4005FA53.3000301@RCousins.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4005FA53.3000301@RCousins.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Query about ext[32]fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:29:36 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:26:27PM -0800, Robert Cousins wrote: > Hello: > Does anyone know if the ext[23]fs code works for AMD64? > I'm in the process of building a triple boot machine (XP, Linux, FreeBSD) > and it appears that the best option for sharing data between the > environments > is ext[23]fs since there is now 3rd party support for ext2fs under XP. I don't know of anyone that has tested it. Please let us know what you find out. > My obvious fallback is FAT which is obviously less functional from > FreeBSD and Linux. fat32 acutally, which at least gives you long file names.