From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Dec 29 08:20:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834B2EB1524; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AD016C4; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A6F0B167B3; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:20:06 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: wen heping Cc: Wen Heping , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ????: svn commit: r457491 - in head/textproc/sxml: . files Message-ID: <20171229082006.GB14519@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712290330.vBT3UDDY076733@repo.freebsd.org> <20171229074803.GA14519@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:20:07 -0000 On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 07:57:21AM +0000, wen heping wrote: > > This line was added wrongly; few years ago ports were sweeped to > > remove direct author attribution, and now you're adding them back. > > Please don't. > > This author is upstream author, It does not matter. Author information is typically available on the website, and that's what WWW: line is for. (By this logic, every piece of software has author(s), shall we mention them in every port? :-) > I remember some years ago we remove the line of ports author message? We removed old/superfluous/bogus attribution, which most often was some "ported by" thing, yes, but not just limited to that. (When upstream authors want their attribution to be more visible, they should fix their websites (WWW: line), not abuse pkg-descr for this.) ./danfe