From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct 13 12:39:56 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ipperformance.com (ipperf.com [206.225.36.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6466537B502; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rbg.ipperf.com ([10.1.0.66])
	by ipperformance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03228;
	Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:11:57 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from rbg@ipperformance.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rbg.ipperf.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA73816;
	Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:11:51 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from rbg@ipperformance.com)
From: rbg@ipperformance.com
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:11:51 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <20001012.161151.107931129.rbg@ipperformance.com>
To: lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca
Cc: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: etherchannel 
In-Reply-To: <200010122106.e9CL6dE22139@orthanc.ab.ca>
References: <200010122040.e9CKeZh01234@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
	<200010122106.e9CL6dE22139@orthanc.ab.ca>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b43 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


How does this compare with Intel's Adaptive Load Balancing (ALB) ? 
-- I guess it's closer to Intel's Link Aggregation ?? 

Robert..
    _____________________________________________________________
    Robert Gordon                      rbg@ipperf.com
    IP Performance, Inc  
    Austin, Texas.                     <http://www.ipperf.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message