From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 8 18:15:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1F516A400; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from ns.trinitel.com (186.161.36.72.static.reverse.layeredtech.com [72.36.161.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1FB13C465; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from neutrino.vnode.org (r74-193-81-203.pfvlcmta01.grtntx.tl.dh.suddenlink.net [74.193.81.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns.trinitel.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l68IFeUg005026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:15:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <469129C7.7090008@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 13:15:35 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070629) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juergen Lock References: <20070702203027.GA45302@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <468DB791.9020502@freebsd.org> <200707071402.l67E2Gpm051150@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <200707071402.l67E2Gpm051150@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on ns.trinitel.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:15:44 -0000 On 07/07/07 09:02, Juergen Lock wrote: > In article <468EFF46.4060001@freebsd.org> you write: >> On 07/05/07 22:31, Eric Anderson wrote: >>> On 07/02/07 15:30, Juergen Lock wrote: >>>> Looks like its time for this again... Many bugs have been fixed, >>>> some features have been added, like, qemu-system-arm has grown >>>> emulation of a few PDAs like some Zaurus models, etc. As always, >>>> please test now, before I commit this, so we won't be in for >>>> nasty surprises afterwards... >>> Works great so far on -CURRENT, thanks! >>> >>> Did the vmwarevga thing ever settle down, and become stable? >> >> >> Although now I have the issue where using kqemu-kmod causes my system to >> reboot or power off. :( >> >> Any ideas? > > This seems to be a -current issue, it doesn't happen for me at least > (6.2 and previously also 6.1.) You could check if it is dependent > on the version of the used qemu (the 0.9.0 port, the version of > qemu-devel in ports, or the not-yet-committed updated I posted), > but I doubt it. What may help is finding out which commit to -current > started kqemu to break (find an older version that worked, then > binary-search), or at least a backtrace from a kernel compiled > without -fomit-frame-pointer (putting DDB in the config seems to do > that for amd64 at least, but rebuild the entire kernel.) There also > is an open issue for kqemu on amd64 smp, > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113430 > dunno if its related... > > Juergen My host is i386, SMP, and it also happens with the current qemu-devel port. It must have been something in -CURRENT that changed, probably since May15th-ish. I can't do a binary search anytime soon to find it. In the past, I've recompiled kqemu and that has done the trick. I have all the debugging built in, but that doesn't stop the system from rebooting or powering off. Eric