Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:56:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236424] print/ghostscript9-agpl-base indirectly depends on X11 Message-ID: <bug-236424-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236424 Bug ID: 236424 Summary: print/ghostscript9-agpl-base indirectly depends on X11 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: doceng@FreeBSD.org Reporter: ke.freebsd@karlewald.de Flags: maintainer-feedback?(doceng@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: doceng@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback? It is stated that ghostscript9-agpl-base is supposed not to depend on X11. However, by requiring print/cups (due to library libcupsimage.so) the dependency chain from cups includes libraries: libavahi-client.so : net/avahi-app libdbus-1.so : devel/dbus both of which depend on X11. This conflicts with the intention of not requi= ring X11. This dependency seems to be a consequence of merging cups-image into cups o= n 11 Mar 2016, as previously (valid when ghostscript9-agpl-base was created to be the non-X11 part on 2015-08-22) libcupsimage.so was in print/cups-image and= did not cause this dependency. (Note, I am using packages, so I cannot choose to unselect CUPS. I do not n= eed CUPS, actually I would not even need ghostscript itself but it is a depende= ncy of graphics/ImageMagick7-nox11 and since ghostscript9-agpl-base also claims= to not depend on X11, I think this is the right point to intervene.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236424-7788>