From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 17 10:02:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDE2106564A for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edhoprima@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA768FC14 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so2881752bwz.13 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:02:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=m7gOMfs0dQHhtzSFVvMm3dEBNFbPsXQ4eiQGucPne0o=; b=w86ang8olUZWs1LO5mp1ZGMp5ZYouZX+1U/2VCx5OVOIssv+dr/6ByriWMjoADWJ0N qMATc9pGIhTqul5iwc/x5y83EHYijjhczJVi9C+q5A3bAL9Xaq8tIIAS8Newz3zdu1Dg iWiPAEyp5uHp59Ioi+Y9v0NvAAGnLXgUfuIUk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=tHLFIfXswBJbmNpwcshcxqugGLtYC+kON3s5mDagw5Bjv3iZ6bkjkXgMMYbh+gQQB5 47dEHzr85xda2gwwNpUnxj6yDAjNOcWYOFp61Y5BjeLhxK5WxswnoVX1qe0ghPEMSMOE +q3pinZQThEyHBHEViQGmyozvGgusbAj7PnKI= Received: by 10.204.128.198 with SMTP id l6mr1481723bks.19.1308303517016; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:38:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.144.207 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DF7CDD0.8040108@scsiguy.com> <20110615120524.GI1975@garage.freebsd.pl> <4DF8ACD3.1070202@scsiguy.com> From: Edho P Arief Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:37:48 +0700 Message-ID: To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , Pawel Jakub Dawidek , fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR][ZFS] Add "zpool labelclear" command. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:02:11 -0000 On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:02 PM, krad wrote: > > Its worth noting that its not necessarily a good idea to let zfs handle a > raw disk. There is a good argument that you should partition/slice it up > with a gig or so less capacity than the drive has.This is due to all drives > X TB capacity not being equal. One block less and you new 2TB drive wont > work in you existing array. Actually it will. At least up to 10 MB based on my previous experience (under openindiana oi_148, at least).