From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Oct 2 11:43:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB78A0CE42 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC241B43 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3nS8Sk6w2MzZt2; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:37:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1443785861; x=1445600262; bh=BDBX4txkpT+6z8ZbQ3e+5STZz5YY4enVVTf eMjILv1M=; b=dDMNtlWLAfmmQVXF5w51ge/ZHrW3r6os/oIk1MvVIVtH4oPD17a GNq+2xXkJr+0LEr5HPIB9F7ZnJhjLUzCpxMdWZSxCjGz/qoyC0/K5d+vFlri4nRS 5brpy3D4+4S3tgQ6pHFLxmA84Fn5UCB3sAYGN1oV3h+lXBwY97OrTcgs= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i_EpzVHzFnJ8; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: recommended poudriere jail versions? To: Mark Martinec , FreeBSD Stable References: <20151001103206.2d2603a4@efreet.kappastar.com> From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: <560E6C84.3010500@madpilot.net> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:37:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:43:17 -0000 On 10/01/15 14:05, Mark Martinec wrote: > 2015-10-01 10:32, Marko Cupać wrote: >> what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? So >> far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every minor >> version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, but I ended >> up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and 10.2), where I need to >> rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is >> starting to take too much of my time. >> >> I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per >> architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built >> on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for >> 10.2- on 10.1-? > > I used to have poudriere jails based on a minor version like you have, > but ended up in a simplified setup, building ports only on 10.0-RELEASE > and installing them on 10.1 or 10.2 and 10-STABLE. I think the > official packages are also built based on 10.0-RELEASE . Official packages are being build on 10.1-RELEASE at present. It's the lowest supported minor in the 10 branch. -- Guido Falsi