From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 12 16:19:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12290 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 16:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA12282 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 16:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com [204.244.213.33] by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.61 #1) id 0wR4NL-0001X3-00; Mon, 12 May 1997 16:19:27 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 16:19:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GNU is not tar In-Reply-To: <3377A659.A21@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 12 May 1997, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Hi, > GNU tar gave me some problems setting the blocksize, so I remembered > someone recommended an alternative tar program on the ports list. I > think our gnu tar is outdated (current version should be 1.12), but > looking at: > ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/star/README.otherbugs > my conclusion is that GNU tar is so buggy we should replace it in the > base distribution and move it to the ports tree. > > Pedro. The FreeBSD tar is not a "pure" GNU version. Many local changes were made, include bug fixes. You also don't mention what version of FreeBSD you are using. Tom