Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:08:32 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi.c acpi_battery.c acpi_cp Message-ID: <20021019180832.A53067@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021018110118.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 11:01:18AM -0400 References: <20021017202151.A40624@freebie.xs4all.nl> <XFMail.20021018110118.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 11:01:18AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 17-Oct-2002 Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:28:53AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > >> jhb 2002/10/16 10:28:53 PDT > >> > >> Modified files: > >> sys/dev/acpica acpi.c acpi_battery.c acpi_cpu.c > >> acpi_ec.c acpi_lid.c acpi_powerres.c > >> acpi_thermal.c > >> sys/dev/acpica/Osd OsdInterrupt.c > >> Log: > >> Catch up to changes in acpivar.h to add support for using ACPI on > >> 4-stable systems. > > > > Hm? I thought 4.x would never gain ACPI support? Or do I misinterpret? > > I've backported all but the PCI bits. I don't plan on committing ACPI > itself to 4.x, but there are several people who like/need things like > soft power-off to work on 4.x, so I'm trying to make it as easy as > possible to just drop in the ACPI bits into a 4.x tree and get ACPI support > with a small patch. GREAT STUFF! I have a Compaq EVON160 laptop which is ACPI-only and to which this would fit like a charm ;) -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021019180832.A53067>