From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 29 10:23:50 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA04539 for current-outgoing; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA04534 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:23:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA30469; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 13:23:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 13:23:37 -0500 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" Message-Id: <9512291823.AA30469@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: Faried Nawaz Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: finger problem. In-Reply-To: <199512290307.TAA04622@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu> References: <199512290307.TAA04622@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu> Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk < said: > finger @uidaho.edu > finger @hotcity.com Hmmm... There look to be two different problems here... 13:16:16.216366 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1195 > crow.csrv.uidaho.edu.finger: SFP 1329011561:1329011563(2) win 16728 (DF) We send one packet with all the information.... 13:16:16.379675 crow.csrv.uidaho.edu.finger > khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1195: S 288832000:288832000(0) ack 1329011562 win 8192 They reply, acknowledging everything except the FIN bit. 13:16:16.379957 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1195 > crow.csrv.uidaho.edu.finger: F 3:3(0) ack 1 win 16728 (DF) We reply, resending the FIN bit. 13:16:16.516433 crow.csrv.uidaho.edu.finger > khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1195: . ack 4 win 8190 They acknowledge the FIN bit. 13:16:16.835325 crow.csrv.uidaho.edu.finger > khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1195: F 1:1(0) ack 4 win 8192 They then send a FIN bit of their own, without sending anything. 13:16:16.835577 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1195 > crow.csrv.uidaho.edu.finger: . ack 2 win 16728 (DF) And we acknowledge their close. Here's the other one, where it looks like hotcity.com has gotten itself /really/ confused. 13:17:06.198470 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197 > hotcity.com.finger: SFP 1339044514:1339044516(2) win 16728 (DF) 13:17:12.000913 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197 > hotcity.com.finger: SFP 1339044514:1339044516(2) win 16728 (DF) 13:17:12.633025 hotcity.com.finger > khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197: SF 3506960969:3506960969(0) ack 1339044515 win 14335 13:17:12.633308 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197 > hotcity.com.finger: F 3:3(0) ack 2 win 16727 (DF) 13:17:12.943619 hotcity.com.finger > khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197: R 3506960971:3506960971(0) win 0 13:17:15.616483 hotcity.com.finger > khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197: SF 3506960969:3506960969(0) ack 1339044515 win 14335 13:17:15.616700 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197 > hotcity.com.finger: R 1339044515:1339044515(0) win 0 13:17:21.621782 hotcity.com.finger > khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197: SF 3506960969:3506960969(0) ack 1339044515 win 14335 13:17:21.622043 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197 > hotcity.com.finger: R 1339044515:1339044515(0) win 0 13:17:33.630237 hotcity.com.finger > khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197: SF 3506960969:3506960969(0) ack 1339044515 win 14335 13:17:33.630453 khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu.1197 > hotcity.com.finger: R 1339044515:1339044515(0) win 0 Both of these seem likely to be bugs in the other end's software. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant