From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Aug 19 09:25:35 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA04942 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 09:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post.vale.com (post.vale.com [204.117.217.66]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA04936 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 09:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jaguar.vale.com by post.vale.com id aa27858; 19 Aug 96 11:24 CDT Received: by jaguar.vale.com with Microsoft Mail id <01BB8DC2.139CB6F0@jaguar.vale.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 11:32:17 -0500 Message-ID: <01BB8DC2.139CB6F0@jaguar.vale.com> From: Hal Snyder To: "'freebsd-chat@freebsd.org'" Subject: Microsoft's overwhelmed FTP servers Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 11:32:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com wrote: ... >Let's see... that's about 5300 or so requests per hour, assuming a >steady stream of them. Hmm. I notice the IE download page shows five >servers in Redmond offering IE. >So we're talking ~1100 requests per hour per machine. And *that* is >overwhelming demand?! Hahahaahahah!! ftp.cdrom.com does that many >*at the same time.* Would it not be more fair to compare bytes per hour? Internet Exploder is a large file, probably much larger than the average download from ftp.cdrom.com. I'd sure like to see objective comparisons of FreeBSD v. NT networking, shorn of marketing hype and O/S holy war rhetoric. P.S.: Is there a way to query on-line current download stats for ftp.cdrom.com? I remember around the time Quake came out someone (David Greenman?) posted some impressive numbers.