From owner-freebsd-chat  Fri Oct 31 23:45:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA05973
          for chat-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:45:37 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA05966
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:45:33 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from spork@super-g.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by super-g.inch.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA06902;
	Sat, 1 Nov 1997 02:42:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 02:42:07 -0500 (EST)
From: spork <spork@super-g.com>
X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com
To: Douglas Carmichael <dcarmich@mcs.com>
cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Trademark problems w/Cisco with that one
In-Reply-To: <199711010026.SAA00391@dcarmich.pr.mcs.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971101024138.3924A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Sorry, I have to ;)

Would that be a "hissy fit" or a "HSSI fit"?

On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Douglas Carmichael wrote:

> Cisco might raise a hissy-fit about that one because their router operating
> system is called IOS, Internetwork Operating System.
>