From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 18 16:50:45 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA12501 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:50:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zeal.admin.ogi.edu (zeal.admin.ogi.edu [129.95.20.109]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12496 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:50:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from don@admin.ogi.edu) Received: from admin.ogi.edu (jest.admin.ogi.edu [129.95.68.62]) by zeal.admin.ogi.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA07781 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:55:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36A32B66.A15D1F44@admin.ogi.edu> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 04:39:03 -0800 From: Don JW Westlight Organization: Oregon Graduate Institute X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: http://www.freebsd.org/y2kbug.html Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Your Y2K page doesn't have a nice matrix to show which problems are fixed in which release. Example Table version notes 2.2.2 compliant except ... 2.2.3 compliant except ... 2.2.4 compliant except ... 2.2.5 compliant except .... 2.2.6 compliant except ... 2.2.7 compliant except ... 2.2.8 compliant except TK, INN, Knews, NNTP 2.2.9 compliant You do have a nice table of bug fixes, but it would be far more useful if you have some table by revision number so I could look at 2.2.X to see which things had been fixed in which revision. I'd love to have a "Y2K" stamp of approval for the basic OS on a particular version. Is this making any sense? Am I looking in the wrong place? Don Westlight Sr. Network Engineer Oregon Graduate Institute don@admin.ogi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message