From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Dec  4 18:14:52 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA27933
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 18:14:52 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA27928
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 18:14:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA28210; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 18:14:20 -0800 (PST)
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
cc: pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co, stefan@promo.de, ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
        frankch@waru.life.nthu.edu.tw
Subject: Re: ports/5214: New port rasmol 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 04 Dec 1997 10:26:39 PST."
             <199712041826.KAA03068@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 18:14:20 -0800
Message-ID: <28207.881288060@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  * No, that'd be biochemistry and the inorganic chemists would scream at
>  * being lumped into that category. :-)
> 
> What about "chembio" then?  Or will physical biologists scream? :)

Why not just keep them separate and avoid all contraversy, eh? :-)

					Jordan