Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Dec 2015 04:52:13 +0000
From:      Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: EFI/ZFS Update: successful tests, need more complex vdevs
Message-ID:  <566A567D.2060101@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5669F7B8.7030706@multiplay.co.uk>
References:  <CABnVG=dcayeG7SwzZwv7wzDHqioVXo8uG-u=wW43S0VRJkeiTw@mail.gmail.com> <CALfReyfp6gsbD-x81cU7EX%2B4TM%2Bv7zVNLzFPeOVFDqoXjpq=Kg@mail.gmail.com> <5669C3BD.4010402@multiplay.co.uk> <5669F7B8.7030706@multiplay.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Issue fixed, review updated with new patch in the comments so raidz is 
now bootable :)

     Regards
     Steve

On 10/12/2015 22:07, Steven Hartland wrote:
> I have to take it back, while single disk worked fine as soon as we 
> tried raidz2 we get:
>
>    Initializing modules: ZFS UFS
> ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable
> ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable
> ZFS: can't find root dsl_dir
> ZFS: can't find root filesystem
> ...
>
> So some more work to be done yet it seems.
>
> On 10/12/2015 18:26, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> We've used Eric's hard work which is currently under review here:
>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4104
>>
>> I'm pleased to report we can now successfully EFI boot root ZFS from 
>> a raidz2 pool on Intel P3700 NVMe drives :)
>>
>> Here's a guide for those interested:
>> http://blog.multiplay.co.uk/2015/12/freebsd-10-2-release-efi-zfs-root-boot/ 
>>
>>
>> On 04/11/2015 12:35, krad wrote:
>>> is there not anyway freebsd could provide patched signed binaries 
>>> outside
>>> the main distros for testing purposes, as it should be fairly straight
>>> forward to drop them in? I think you might be a much bigger audience 
>>> for
>>> testing then?
>>>
>>> On 2 November 2015 at 19:16, Gabor Radnai <gabor.radnai@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Appreciate, thank you very much. I think my confusion is because 
>>>> the latest
>>>> patch you provided on the list
>>>> on *Fri Oct 23 11:19:07 UTC 2015*
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20151023/db1ac571/attachment.bin 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> is not a full patch but a diff to your original patch. Anyhow, I'm 
>>>> ok now
>>>> applying original patch and this latest diff everything seems fine
>>>> (apart that for some reason my server dislikes booting 
>>>> automatically from
>>>> the EFI partition, manually loading bootx64.efi works like charm.
>>>> but that's definitely nothing to do with your great work).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
>>>> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
>>> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?566A567D.2060101>