From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 25 11:50:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A65B106566B for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f223.google.com (mail-fx0-f223.google.com [209.85.220.223]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2549F8FC2C for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so34663fxm.3 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:50:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=glJh1nQMs/AQSKhGHuDkiYew/yo3Q5+UFmy0mT/M+zU=; b=nuq5KZMP5KtLsJ0PuOuJ/LKBcFkUy4UyYIxxyjkUd2EuQ5uXU8nGf9mWlf6sMA6/5G eKRQynfHEco/2nUWYbMtRN07Zr/P05UXzxFSEymlPkOL5nMr+1Be833saR5SX3/Z2Sh2 ejBD+4eoJpabON6v4MTbqkDHV0Qq4jxX3gJkE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cd4vsQxgsKVD8jjiyQzYDt2KAvq3IyfEV7OUXXj3FEE1BvrxykCJcUnJXjB5XMsa+L kd1vj229jj1XgZ4HckHFaT43QWrbC9yQpQ08wGJpSv95k7u+VE9Bg0WQvOA1QeXbEv06 sC2nAOg0I6uVg5b1EwcK+wNMpFJKmE9AvJgEs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.15.89 with SMTP id j25mr955665faa.97.1267096721683; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:18:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:18:41 +0100 Message-ID: <3f1fd1ea1002250318o582bbd5ua5a695e3af5e3cb9@mail.gmail.com> From: "varga.michal@gmail.com" To: gnome@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: marcuscom and www/epiphany-extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:50:21 -0000 Hello guys, it's been quite some months into the 2.29 development cycle, and there is still no www/epiphany-extensions on marcuscom to be seen. Is there something wrong that prevents it from being ported, or it's just an oversight / lack of manpower? (In that case, I could do it.) m.