Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:27:55 -0500 From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>, "arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Libxo bugs and fixes. Message-ID: <201501060227.t062RtXw095998@idle.juniper.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=p8tHWpzucPzYdySp6HwvrJg8GzPdSKGZZKyJAG7dnwg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd writes: >... hm, lost in all of that - so does the proposed API change actually >delineate records somehow? > >(Ie, not having the "close/open tags" bit as a hard-coded new record, >but a "this is a self contained record, ok, we're going to output >another one.") > >It will be useful for things that aren't time-series graphs. Well, it's not that far along yet, but no, there's nothing cooked into it to make the delinations. This would be either a callback, or a set of "well known" protocols, such as NLD-json. The same plumbing should be usable for other domains. Thanks, Phil
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201501060227.t062RtXw095998>