Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:08:42 -0400
From:      "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <Alex.Kovalenko@verizon.net>
To:        Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?
Message-ID:  <1097878121.812.3.camel@RabbitsDen>
In-Reply-To: <20041015170354.GF16083@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
References:  <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <416EDA36.1070403@DeepCore.dk> <1097850967.843.14.camel@RabbitsDen> <20041015170354.GF16083@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 13:03, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> * Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko, 2004-10-15 :
> 
> > be fair, I do not know if it still is the case. If there is enough
> > interest out there, I can plug it back in.
> 
> If you can do that experiment and le tme know what happens, I'd
> certainly be interested in fixing this issue.
> 
> Thomas.

I have added device atapicam back into my config, rebuilt the kernel and
have been running for about an hour of light use with no visible ill
effects. I will keep it in at least through couple of buildworlds and CD
burns, but for now I would like to apologize for spreading FUD.
---
Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1097878121.812.3.camel>