Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:45:53 -0600 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca>, "'Timur I. Bakeyev'" <timur@com.bat.ru>, <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba* Message-ID: <011b01c3fa4e$0786e560$1402a8c0@dwcjr> References: <20040223203856.460EC43D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
These are issues that need to be brought up to the samba team. I'm working on updating to 3.0.2 now which may fix some of your problems. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca> To: "'Timur I. Bakeyev'" <timur@com.bat.ru>; <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org> Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:38 PM Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: samba* > I see. I ran the 3.0.x branch and I've found it to be stable for the most > part, however character conversion (needed to setup file sharing for Macs) > did not work, and neither did the vfs modules I needed. Hope the issues get > resolved soon. > > Thanks. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Timur I. Bakeyev [mailto:timur@com.bat.ru] > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:42 AM > To: Mike Jakubik; dwcjr@FreeBSD.org > Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba* > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:12:18 -0500 > "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca> wrote: > >Hello, > > > > I am just wondering, but shouldn't samba be moved to samba-old and > >samba-devel to samba? It is my understanding that the latest stable > >code is 3.0.2a, and the 2.2 branch is only getting security updates. > > Well, 3.0 branch isn't yet 'stable' in the FreeBSD sence, at least. If you > take a look on a samba roadmap, they expect stability only in the 3.x series > of samba. Samba 3 is still for brave ones or for those who need new features > badly :) > > Cheers, > Timur. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?011b01c3fa4e$0786e560$1402a8c0>