From owner-freebsd-commit  Fri Nov 17 07:25:26 1995
Return-Path: owner-commit
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA08912
          for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:25:26 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA08899
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:25:23 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA08889
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:25:21 -0800
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA08875
          ; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:25:05 -0800
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id HAA00259; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:24:58 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id HAA00371; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:24:30 -0800
Message-Id: <199511171524.HAA00371@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_de.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Nov 95 13:38:27 +0100."
             <1556.816611907@critter.tfs.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:24:30 -0800
Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

>> P.S. Changes like this post-2.1 really make a strong argument for a
>> unified patch mechanism.  Can we start talking about this again
>> now, please?
>> 
>I'm all for using CTM.

   CTM isn't for everyone. I really would prefer an FTP based patch mechanism.

-DG