From owner-cvs-all Fri Jan 1 02:50:54 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA27305 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 02:50:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA27297; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 02:50:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id LAA00787; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 11:50:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA09354; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 11:50:07 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from j) Message-ID: <19990101115006.46076@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 11:50:06 +0100 From: J Wunsch To: committers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Postfix is coming. new uid, gid required. Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch References: <199812311615.IAA15286@hub.freebsd.org> <199812312006.MAA01368@dingo.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <199812312006.MAA01368@dingo.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Thu, Dec 31, 1998 at 12:06:18PM -0800 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk As Mike Smith wrote: > Now is not a good time for a -core member to be demonstrating personal > bias over established convention with regards to the FreeBSD source tree. Just for the records: it's _not_ only his personal bias, but Jonathan got the collective OK from the core-team for this import, considering the possible side-effects. We believe this was the best decision to do right now. This doesn't mean things could and should not be reconsidered after e. g. a year. You could note that there are precendent cases for both, software going out of the regular tree into ports and vice versa, so if vmailer turned out to be used by only a small minority, there's no fear it could not be moved into a port then. Apart from this, i agree with Poul-Henning here (and you might notice i didn't always agree with him during the recent couple of weeks :), this discussion is only a waste of bandwidth. Nobody is hurt by vmailer, people who love sendmail (like me) or even need it (for UUCP, like me :) still have it, people who are looking for an alternative that's easier to configure have the option as well. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message