From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 17 06:11:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A451065675; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freealson@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8AC8FC19; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so2496511iyj.13 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:11:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=z/Oj4vjhf4T89l/gIkIgPqyua0pX65jDBWrWbHI/p4s=; b=NS52cuXjdlQSmkQj97lVzJXXhKM5ZMpy4MvaosEcepvPXP6b/BpC9xLyUivBgFx601 eT0QK02arQAX13L9FB2gZIQIqDDymcMd4YgIyMArxjhAgkRpEIIS2VuDv5hUTDuUWV+J u4EXFJvhUmsM5LS/kUNSHjJthGUiJ7xR86iZU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=assMCsLoulL34c0vDKHI7WD/fClq/FXICD02jFq6X5+JGDM1TT+SPePH2jeJqzzxde qz4JcPNFZN3I5SY/KHFTM1B9SU2g9vafappxgQFqXOmoRodEqXJPcNyoaBHIKIwt/Tet Dh14IMDhB7c6TOp1yJ7U8KwFmq9p9pjzUMeyo= Received: by 10.42.221.3 with SMTP id ia3mr1775615icb.181.1308291102243; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.11.25.147] ([202.129.163.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f13sm738854ibe.61.2011.06.16.23.11.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1242) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Lang Hai In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:11:33 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5983C77D-13B7-4855-BDB0-A00E8D2BF2DE@gmail.com> References: <6F24ECDD-78FB-473D-A249-B76A3615D0AF@gmail.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1242) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2nd deprecation campaign X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:11:43 -0000 On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public = available distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be = excluded from this depreciation. >=20 > That is the way it is done, anyway there still could be some false > positive having people to doulble check is always good :) Agreed, but I just feel like these ports should not be in the = depreciation list at the first place. That's my point my I could be = wrong. >=20 >>>=20 >> So yes, always give people chance to fix ports, not remove them from = the tree. >>=20 >> And, do we have a list of all maintainer-wanted ports, because that = would be great if we have. > Here you are :) > = http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=3Dmaintainer&method=3Dexact&que= ry=3Dports@FreeBSD.org >=20 What if we just put all un-maintained ports in this list instead of in = the depreciation list? >=20 >> Regards, >> Hai Lang >=20 > regards, > Bapt Regards, Hai Lang=