Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:06:43 +0200
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: devfs panic w/INVARIANTS
Message-ID:  <20100205100643.GQ15587@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <4B6B30BC.7030107@cs.duke.edu>
References:  <4B6B30BC.7030107@cs.duke.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--U+NfgObvpQT1Q9Yq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:40:28PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> I've got a commercial driver that uses device cloning.
> At unload time, the driver calls clone_cleanup(). When I unload
> the driver when the kernel is built with INVARIANTS, I'll see a
> panic in devfs_populate_loop().  This happens in 6-stable,
> as well as 8-stable.
>=20
> From what I can see the clone has been freed, but it
> remains on the devfs cdevp_list.   Then the next time
> devfs_populate_loop() is called, it trips over the bad
> entry (cdp->cdp_dirents points to 0xdeadc0dedeadc0de)
> See appended kgdb session.
>=20
> If I trace the code path, it looks like clone_cleanup()
> calls destroy_devl().  And destroy_devl() will eventually
> call devfs_free() if the si_refcnt is zero.  But I don't
> see anything which will get the cdev removed from
> the cdevp_list prior to it being freed.
>=20
> The only code I see which will get the cdev removed from
> the cdevp_list() seems to be the "GC any lingering devices"
> block in devfs_populate_loop
>=20
> What am I missing?

You did not mentioned it, but my guess is that you create clones from
the dev_clone event handler. Please note that devfs_lookup() that fires
dev_clone event, consumes a device reference. Thus clone handlers shall
do dev_ref().

Due to races with cleanup, you should use MAKEDEV_REF flag for
make_dev_credv(9) KPI instead of doing make_dev()/dev_ref() pair.

That said, do you really need clones at all ?

--U+NfgObvpQT1Q9Yq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAktr7bMACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jGpgCg3IgMWZSS8Y5S5VoYdizbL5Zg
6xIAoLj2BoZxbjtThCVR+lG1uWtttqkk
=i4F5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--U+NfgObvpQT1Q9Yq--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100205100643.GQ15587>