From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Jan 13 15:37:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A11A81C27; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB27A1C2A; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id E9DDD1359; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:37:48 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jimmy Olgeni Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r404810 - head/devel/elixir-timex Message-ID: <20160113153748.GA38723@FreeBSD.org> References: <201512300841.tBU8fsYI090905@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201512300841.tBU8fsYI090905@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:37:49 -0000 On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 08:41:54AM +0000, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > New Revision: 404810 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/404810 > > Log: > Upgrade devel/elixir-timex to version 1.0.0. > > [...] > @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ > # $FreeBSD$ > > PORTNAME= timex > -DISTVERSION= 1.0.0-rc4 > +PORTVERSION= 1.0.0 > +PORTEPOCH= 1 Why did you bump port epoch here? DISTVERSION ensures that resulting PORTVERSION is correctly mangled, and used for -betas and -rcs because it allows seamless update to subsequent .0 releases: $ make -V PORTVERSION DISTVERSION=1.0.0-rc4 1.0.0.r4 $ pkg version -t 1.0.0.r4 1.0.0 < What's even more strange is that I've made a very similar complaint to cy@ on Decemlber 9th WRT r403347. All committers should read svn-* lists, how come you've missed it? :-( ./danfe